Cases and Proof

Browse public cases and before/after proof

If homepage copy, FAQ, and docs are already clear enough, the next question is usually whether there is stronger public proof. This hub collects only already-public evidence and turns it into standalone owners.

Each page reuses public compare data, screenshots, testimonials, and roadmap facts instead of inventing hidden success stories.

The goal is stronger E-E-A-T, stronger conversion proof, and more citable public pages.

Each page keeps savings and manual boundary together so the proof stays grounded.

Published cases and proof pages

Start from either a contained integration case or a broader before/after proof page, then continue into workflow, docs, or FAQ.

Public screenshot of VectoUI Unity plugin installation via Git URL

Case Study

How a small Unity team can move from Lanhu design files into a first prefab validation loop

This is not another generic marketing page. It combines the current released path, public setup screenshots, and already-public feedback so the first integration case can be judged from real public evidence instead of slogans.

  • The current public evidence is already strong enough to support a first Lanhu-to-Unity integration validation path without relying only on homepage copy.
  • One public quote from a two-person Unity studio says one screen moved from a day and a half into a direct logic-binding stage, but that line remains a quoted public testimonial rather than a universal benchmark.
Evidence boundary: this page only uses the current public Lanhu-to-Unity released status, public docs screenshots, homepage compare flow, and already-public feedback. It does not invent private customer data.
Open proof page
Public screenshot of the VectoUI Unity generation step

Before and After

Where does the real difference show up between manual UI delivery and VectoUI?

The homepage already shows a before/after comparison, but a standalone proof page is better for explaining what actually changes, what becomes faster, and what still remains explicit engineering work.

  • The public homepage already exposes the strongest time-level signal: traditional workflow `1 hour – 2 days` versus automated workflow `~5 seconds`.
  • The real difference is not only speed. It also changes who handles slices, how hierarchy is restored, and where the engineer starts working.
Evidence boundary: this page reuses the public homepage comparison, public docs screenshots, and already-public feedback. It does not invent unpublished project metrics.
Open proof page